Filed under: FAQ by Jeff Servaas |
We sometimes get asked: “what is the best charge rate to use in my MH-C9000 for my batteries?”.
We recommend 0.5C as a standard charge rate. That is 0.5 multiplied by the battery capacity. Here is an example:
0.5C charge rate x 1000mAh battery capacity = 500mA charge rate.
If you are in a hurry, you can use a charge rate up to 1C without concern of damage, but at 0.5C charge rate you will get a more complete battery charge. A slower charge will result in a slightly higher capacity, and it is easier for the battery to absorb the energy at a slower rate, which will contribute to a longer battery life. So why not charge even slower and get more charge capacity and more battery cycles from the rechargeable batteries?
Using a slower charge rate has a diminishing marginal benefit. Going any slower than 0.5C does not result in much difference to energy capacity or battery longevity.Futhermore, we recommend a minimum charge rate of 0.3C. Below 0.3C it is more difficult for the MH-C9000 to detect the change in voltage and know when to terminate the charge.
As a guide, here is a chart for our main battery models:
| Battery |
Minimum charge rate |
Recommended charge rate |
Maximum charge rate |
| AAA IMEDION 800mAh |
300mA |
400mA |
800mA |
| AAA Powerex 1000mAh |
300mA |
500mA |
1000mA |
| AA IMEDION 2100mAh |
600mA |
1000mA |
2000mA |
| AA Powerex 2700mAh |
800mA |
1300mA |
2000mA |
Comments (4)
RSS feed for comments on this post.
| TrackBack URI
You can also bookmark
this on del.icio.us or check the cosmos
|
I totally agree with charge rates. I tend to stick to 0.3C, rounded up to the nearest 100mA, so for a 1000ma, it would be 333 mA, rounded to 400mA, or 700mA for a 2000mAhr battery. I find the charge completion excellent, the batteries dont get warm, and the C9000 works well there.
I do use a 1C charge if necessary, but that tends to make the batteries pretty warm. They are not too hot, but hotter than I personally like to get them. I have had too many chargers in the past which tend to “cook” batteries, as well as massively overcharge them, so the C9000 is a welcome charger which has cycled my batteries faithfilly for the last 2.5 years pretty much in your above guidelines and the batteries are still testing at well over 90% of their original capacity!
Comment by David — March 6, 2010 @ 9:31 pm
I received my Maha Charger C9000 yesterday and successfully put two Duracell 2650 mAH through the Refresh Analyse mode. Today I am doing the same exercise with another two and they are in the charge cycle and reading 3349 mAH (1.46V) and 3351 mAH (1.46V). I am feeling a little nervous! Are there situations when the charger should be turned off?
Comment by Mary — March 26, 2010 @ 12:47 pm
Hi Mary, are you sure it is in ANALYZE mode rather than BREAK-IN?
While the capacity measurement of 3349mAh is very high, a voltage reading of 1.46V is normal. The charger will automatically terminate when the voltage stops increasing, or if the temperature of the batteries is too high.
Comment by Jeff Servaas — March 26, 2010 @ 2:04 pm
Received my C9000 two days ago and have had some of my Vapex batteries in refresh / analyze overnight. The results were quite informative as the final analysis was not what I had expected all were supposed to be rated at 2900mAH and all were diferent ranging from 2970 – 2300. This just goes to reinforce what everyone has been telling me re getting what you pay for and I have been buying this brand for years but am now going to gradually change over to Powerex as my base brand.
I am just so thankfull that I found Jeffs site when I did!
Comment by John Goard — August 21, 2010 @ 2:36 pm